This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Futures studies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Futures studies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Futures studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Futures studiesTemplate:WikiProject Futures studiesfutures studies articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Unwaranted criticism in relation to superintelligenceedit
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The description of the book seems a bit misleading in that it suggests that Stuart's arguments depend upon the possibility of either artificial human-like intelligence or superintelligence. However, one of Stuart's main points is that machines with only a little intelligence could still pose a threat to humans.
The quoted criticisms are also misleading with regard to this same issue, as well as seeming to misunderstand the notion of "perverse instantiation", which is much more a problem for Weak AI systems than of Strong or Human-like AI. Sifonios (talk) 14:05, 2 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
