Talk:HotHardware

Hot words

Please do not use words which might make this article sound like an advert for your site. Phrases like "leading-edge features" and "forum members are also treated to regular contests" make this seem like an advert. But by all means do continue to edit the article to keep up to date with the site. Williamwade (talk) 02:56, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

COI / Poor References

User:SatyrTN gave the author of this page (who is also the founder of HotHardware) some help, but in doing so also provided some very fair criticism of the references used. I am taking the liberty to copy that criticism here so that someone other than myself can jump in and clean it up. I am going to recuse myself from actively editing the article since I've already put it in a negative light. SatyrTN's comments on the references were:

• The first one (from Slashdot) is probably you, since it's also from "MojoKid". That means you're posting original research, which is not allowed.
• The second reference, from Engadget, is a brief mention that HotHardware has a review of the HP Blackbird. It has no significant coverage of HotHardware, which is what would constitute a reliable source about you.
• Likewise the references at Intel, NVIDIA, and AMD are quotes from HotHardware, and the one at direct2dell is a link to HotHardware. No coverage of you at all.

Thanks helping clean this up. —Noah 08:00, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:HotHardware Screenshot.jpg

Image:HotHardware Screenshot.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 12:33, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on HotHardware. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080224133812/http://ati.amd.com/products/RadeonX1800/reviews.html to http://ati.amd.com/products/RadeonX1800/reviews.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:48, 7 November 2017 (UTC)