Talk:Hoploclonia
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Lennart97 in topic Requested move 21 June 2021
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article contains a translation of Hoploclonia from de.wikipedia. (1029313116 et seq.) |
On 21 June 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from Hoplocloniini to Hoploclonia. The result of the discussion was moved. |
superfluous link in taxobox
editCan somebody plaese tell me how to remove the link from Hoploclonia back to Hoplocloniini (means from a monotypic taxon back to the parents) in the taxobox?--Drägü (talk) 06:40, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Drägü:, if a taxon name redirects, you need to set
|link=
in the taxonomy template for the redirecting taxon name to pipe to the target of the redirect. I've done it in this edit. Plantdrew (talk) 19:37, 19 June 2021 (UTC)- Ah, thanks a lot, I understand ;-) Drägü (talk) 19:58, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Requested move 21 June 2021
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 11:55, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Hoplocloniini → Hoploclonia – Hoplocloniini is a monotypic tribe [1] and had not to get the primary name of this article. The article had to move to the only genus Hoploclonia (see WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA: "the article should go under the scientific name of lowest rank, but no lower than the monotypic genus")
References
- ^ "Phasmida Species File". Phasmida Species File (Version 5.0/5.0). Brock, P.D., Büscher, T. & Baker, E.
- Support - in addition to WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA, IMO users are more likely to search for genera than tribes. Roy Bateman (talk) 04:32, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.