Talk:Honour and Passion

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Zhanzhao in topic Dubious Content being added

Wrong Sypnosis edit

This series had no gay storylines. But this is amazingly funny. —Preceding unsigned comment added by N0rm4nch3w (talkcontribs) 16:51, 2 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I watched this show and i know the sypnosis is wrong too Yun Zhen 10:06, 16 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

As far as I know the synopsis is true to the spirit of the Singapore Armed Forces.

Think people mistaken this series for an older mediacorp series Are You My Brother?. This old army-sponsored series made more sense than Honour and Passion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BestEditorEver88 (talkcontribs) 13:22, 28 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
hmmm... i think so. The two series were pretty similar, although the older one focuses more on comedy. Are You My Brother? was pretty forgettable, unlike shows like the Golden Pillow.Juggernaut999 13:25, 28 September 2007 (UTC)Reply


I don't quite have any source in hand, but IIRC, Are You My Brother is a military-based series that doesn't involve gay storylines while this recent one does. And many other differences too, but essentially the director seemed to have ripped off a bit from that series. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.116.59.28 (talk) 11:02, 4 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

wrong storyline? Don't think so. Must have mistaken for another series.PowerClown123 10:29, 7 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

the story outline was maked out. hence , it was deleted. I luv erky 11:39, 7 October 2007 (UTC) please deleteReply

i have corrected this page (: Stormynight91 02:35, 12 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Dubious Content being added edit

i have undid twice the addition of dubious content to the article. Both additions are similar in essence to previously identified and reverted vandalism [1] which were in turn taken from Uncyclopedia[[2]]. I had also tried googling for any mention of this new questionable content without success. Would be great if the anonymous IPs can provide a source, else its just questionable original research at best. Just in case, however, I will be posting a description of this edit to other Singaporean editors/admins, maybe they have a more accurate take on it. In any case, As per WP:PLOTSUMNOT, it is not necessary to include every minute detail, especially if it is in doubt and removal does not affect the main article. Zhanzhao (talk) 02:40, 8 October 2011 (UTC)Reply