Refs for future use

edit
  • [ Google books: Hunghutze] ( hits)

http://books.google.com/books?id=Jce4rBWjG5wC&pg=PA64#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=u7lIkcj0JN0C&pg=PA10#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=N7Z7mtKVc6AC&pg=PA47#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?ei=TAzNT-HyNdOK0QHB-pn1Dw&id=E1EtAQAAIAAJ&dq=honghuzi&q=hong+huzi

http://books.google.com/books?id=lAxresT12ogC&pg=PA156#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=5OnhlIo4kKoC&pg=PA26#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=s2xuAAAAMAAJ&q=honghuzi&dq=honghuzi&hl=en&sa=X&ei=TAzNT-HyNdOK0QHB-pn1Dw&ved=0CFYQ6AEwBg

http://books.google.com/books?id=ZGRmAAAAMAAJ&q=honghuzi&dq=honghuzi&hl=en&sa=X&ei=TAzNT-HyNdOK0QHB-pn1Dw&ved=0CFwQ6AEwBw

http://books.google.com/books?id=wV_dQ0u3kGoC&pg=PT209#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=vfJiAAAAMAAJ&q=honghuzi&dq=honghuzi&hl=en&sa=X&ei=TAzNT-HyNdOK0QHB-pn1Dw&ved=0CGgQ6AEwCQ

http://books.google.com/books?id=jA0EAQAAIAAJ&q=honghuzi&dq=honghuzi&hl=en&sa=X&ei=UwzNT5fPOKnL0QHC89gG&ved=0CDMQ6AEwADgK

http://books.google.com/books?id=Qu5KojZANpQC&pg=PA216#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=NUTE8V-WhwoC&pg=PA199#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=77F23y4RrnUC&pg=PA77#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=cq3Pyj6_tYMC&pg=PA93#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=GI66AAAAIAAJ&q=honghuzi&dq=honghuzi&hl=en&sa=X&ei=UwzNT5fPOKnL0QHC89gG&ved=0CE8Q6AEwBTgK

http://books.google.com/books?ei=UwzNT5fPOKnL0QHC89gG&id=1H4yAQAAIAAJ&dq=honghuzi&q=hong+huzi

http://books.google.com/books?ei=UwzNT5fPOKnL0QHC89gG&id=t6ntAAAAMAAJ&dq=honghuzi&q=hong+huzi

http://books.google.com/books?id=CiqQIPESpR8C&pg=PA287#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=Epk2F1Mjzv0C&pg=PA136#v=onepage&q&f=false

Russian wiki article more broad and coherent than this

edit

would be nice to translate and import parts of it. 76.119.30.87 (talk) 15:49, 14 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject assessments for quality and importance

edit

Despite this article's length, I barely consider it a start of an encyclopedic article and I almost assessed it as a stub. Wikipedia articles should be concise. Including great swathes of quotations from out of copyright reminiscences does not improve an article quality during assessment. If anything, this practice detracts from an article. The quotes in this article make it so long that I gave up reading. These long quotations add no real value to the article and it would be far better to provide just a brief summary and leave the quotations for Wikiquote or Wikisource. What is needed is the analysis that can be found in secondary and tertiary sources as these contain the necessary synthesis of the facts contained in the reminiscences. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 04:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)Reply