Talk:Hong Joon-pyo

(Redirected from Talk:Hong Jun-pyo)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by 1.235.177.36 in topic We should add a Prosecutorial career section.
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hong Jun-pyo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:55, 4 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

HONG NO LONGER HAS "STRONG CONSERVATIVE CHARACTERISTICS".

edit

STOP SAYING SO. YOU MUSTN'T EVEN BE KOREAN. 1.235.177.36 (talk) 05:42, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Please stop lying. He is still considered a conservative figure within the PPP.--Storm598 (talk) 06:08, 14 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

What I'm saying is true... just ask a random Korean that currently lives in Korea. Or check other wikis about Hong.

I'm a South Korean. And Wiki can't be the basis. In addition, it is only nonsense to say that he is centre-right because he is supported by "Angry young men".--Storm598 (talk) 22:10, 16 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
It's a completely different matter for him to be supported by young people and for his political position to be center-right. Is there any evidence that young people in South Korea are politically more moderate than sampallyuk people?? --Storm598 (talk) 22:13, 16 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Populism?

edit

Hello,

The evidence for him having "populistic characteristics" was a single column written by an unauthorized writer and was written to attack Hong. Not an actual source.

His impression as a "strong conservative, populistic figure" is now gone here in Korea. Please do not use a column as a source, or anything from 2017.

Even without the fact that the evidence was invalid, referring to him as a "right wing populist" is first not the case and second not neutrally descripted.

I suggest describing him as a conservative instead. Also, I suggest adding more information about his life before politics, there's a lot known about it including his story as a prosecutor.

I suggest checking other wikis about him, maybe on namuwiki(It's in Korean though).

Thanks, have a nice weekend. 1.235.177.36 (talk) 13:52, 17 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hong is a centrist.

edit

He had to act like a strong one due to political situations but he was the one who proposed the apartment half-price bill, the Nationality Act...etc. He's actually a centrist. 1.235.177.36 (talk) 10:21, 19 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Cut the crap. You should not write your OR on the wiki. Just by looking at the extreme social conservative personality he sees, you can see that he is never a "centrist".--Storm598 (talk) 10:28, 19 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

- Oh yeah? Why is a column provided as an evidence? This is stupid, no one does that shit.

Why is his life as a prosecutor not included in "Early Life"?

edit

It's a major part of his life... 1.235.177.36 (talk) 10:25, 19 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

We should add a Prosecutorial career section.

edit

Kinda also related to his political career. 1.235.177.36 (talk) 02:23, 21 January 2022 (UTC)Reply