Talk:Hoagie roll

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Cylindrical, long and flat? edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Not sure how anything can be cylindrical, long and flat. I'm not familiar with US cuisine, so I'm not sure whether they are generally circular in section, although I appreciate not everyone would construe "cylinder" that way. Sjwells53 (talk) 17:58, 25 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

I think the 2013 article under “Further Reading” should be removed edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article listed in Further Reading (although relevant), is poorly written and tourist guide fodder. Edjbarger (talk) 21:21, 21 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic