Talk:History of Central Americans in Houston

Why would

This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Why would consolate locations need a citation? Speling12345 (talk) 6:47, 13 December 2013 (UTC) Mainly to prove that they exist. I mean, I understand the Wikipedia principle is to generally cite what is likely to be challenged, but I mainly operate in the presumption that 90% of material can be challenged. WhisperToMe (talk) 02:54, 14 December 2013 (UTC) Speling12345’s account was blocked for disruptive editing, so, the topic is of. Hafspajen (talk) 19:48, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of the Central Americans in Houston. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.campero.com/eng/camperoeuropa.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111001040721/http://www.pollocampero.com/index.php?showPage=180&cat_prod=62&subcat_prod=0&prod=338 to http://www.pollocampero.com/index.php?showPage=180&cat_prod=62&subcat_prod=0&prod=338

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:20, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 5 June 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved (non-admin closure) Mdaniels5757 (talk) 01:20, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

---

• History of the Central Americans in Houston → History of Central Americans in Houston
• History of the Central Americans in Los Angeles → History of Central Americans in Los Angeles

– By WP:DEFINITE and WP:CONCISE, the use of "the" should be dropped from these titles because it simply is not necessary to convey the topics of the articles. Additionally, the use of the definite article in these cases is clunky and should not be in use per WP:NATURALNESS. For now, we can disregard the "political correctness" argument that using the definite article to refer to ethnic groups in certain cases is "othering" and a social wrong. While I personally think this argument is compelling, the true test of whether referring to "Central Americans" with "the" is acceptable can simply be conducted by looking at the wider media: In 2019, news articles mentioning "the Central Americans" were a very small fraction (2.7%) of articles mentioning "Central Americans". By WP:COMMONNAME, the titles of the articles should be changed to reflect this usage by the media. Mysterymanblue (talk) 00:27, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

• Support 100% (and Support other similar moves) per WP:DEFINITE, WP:CONCISE, and especially WP:NATURALNESS and WP:CONSISTENT. You wouldn't say "I learned about the history of the Americans", you say "history of Americans" – and this isn't any different! (You're right, it sounds almost pejorative and othering with a "the".) Paintspot Infez (talk) 03:23, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

RfC

The title of this article is potentially impacted by the outcome of this Request for comment re: entries about ethnic groups in the United States. Page watchers are invited to participate in the ongoing discussion. Thanks! --Another Believer _(Talk) 20:50, 1 October 2021 (UTC)