Talk:History of Lviv

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified


Suggestions for improvement

edit

It is unlikely that this article will attract much traffic any time soon, however a number of things can be done to bring it up to some respectable level. Here are a couple of "to do" ideas in no particular order:

"Militarymen"

edit

"Militarymen" isn't really an English word, and I'm not sure which English word is intended. Were they soldiers (men who had been trained as part of a regular army), militiamen (a group of armed citizens, possibly without formal training or full military discipline), or paramilitaries (an irregular force, typically informally "sponsored" by a government or military, but usually without full acknowledgment of the connection)? - Jmabel | Talk 20:10, 29 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

200,000

edit

This is also very unclear: "the overwhelming Polish majority of an over 200,000 Lviv". Does this mean "Lviv's overwhelming Polish majority of over 200,000" or "the overwhelming Polish majority of Lviv, a city of over 200,000"? Or does it mean something else entirely? - Jmabel | Talk 20:14, 29 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

The second. The city had a population of ~200,000 and Poles consituted a majority of them. This is a rephrased sentence from Subtelny (citaion is given) who does not mention numbers, just says that Poles where an overwhelming majority. We can of course do better by citing the numbers if we can find them. --Irpen 20:55, 29 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. - Jmabel | Talk 05:00, 1 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Bad ISBN

edit

Because it is causing a Checkwiki error #70: "ISBN with wrong length", I removed the ISBN from the entry:

Sowa, Andrzej L. (1998). Stosunki polsko-ukraińskie 1939-1947 (in Polish). Kraków. p. 122. ISBN 839093158. OCLC 48053561.

I have tried unsuccessfully to locate the correct ISBN on the Internet. The same invalid ISBN appears throughout the Polish Wikipedia and in Polish library listings. We could use {{Listed Invalid ISBN}}, but I only use it when I've seen the invalid ISBN printed in the publication with my own eyes. Moreover, the WorldCat oclc id works fine; readers have a way out of the article to find a copy of the publication. Knife-in-the-drawer (talk) 01:20, 17 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of Lviv. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:00, 24 December 2017 (UTC)Reply