Talk:Historically significant lunar eclipses
Latest comment: 3 years ago by 204.113.155.58 in topic What's a "lost Ethan"?
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Historically significant lunar eclipses article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | A fact from Historically significant lunar eclipses appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 May 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
What's a "lost Ethan"? edit
Currently the lead paragraph includes:
Throughout history lunar eclipses have been held to be responsible for such circumstances as lost Ethans ....
What's a "lost Ethan"? Why should anyone care? If this can't be answered well, the reference to "lost Ethan" should be removed. Oaklandguy (talk) 06:14, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
- Actually, it was vandalised by 64.188.238.24 (talk · contribs) on 2017-05-03. Thanks for highlighting - Ninney (talk) 06:33, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi enyone who uses wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.113.155.58 (talk) 14:27, 1 September 2020 (UTC)