Talk:Himbeergeist

Spirits Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirits, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spirits or Distilled beverages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritsWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritsTemplate:WikiProject SpiritsSpirits articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spirits WikiProject task list:

This list is transcluded from the tasks page, to edit it click here.

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Spirits:

Tagging all articles that fall under our scope with {{WikiProject Spirits}} and assessing their quality and importance to the project.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hangon edit

I think there's sufficient context. On subjects such as this which include not a single controversial statement, lack of references isn't enough reason to delete. (Note that I didn't create the article). Malc82 (talk) 19:55, 4 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

__jfl__

I agree, except that the content is wrong. HimbeerGEIST is different from other fruit brandies in that it does not use fermented raspberries to distill this Schnaps, but other types of pomace and low-grade wines. The alcoholic vapor is then passed through Raspberries, thus extracting the flavor. That's why it cannot be called HimbeerWASSER. ("Wasser" being a trad. eau-de-vie and fermented from the fruit directly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.57.11.201 (talk) 08:03, 19 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Photo edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Why is the stuff in the photo red? Shouldn't it be clear, or is there a second maceration not mentioned? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.99.110.156 (talk) 01:02, 12 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Himbeergeist. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071009135736/http://www.hoellberg.de/d/fachlexikon/ to http://www.hoellberg.de/d/fachlexikon/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:16, 4 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic