Talk:Heyy Babyy

I see enough movie trailers on TV. Keep wikipedia neutral.

Hello, this article reads like an advertisement for the movie, doesn't it? Seeing that the movie made me feel dirty and contaminated... Not to mention that it hasn't really been "successful". Some of the reference hyperlinks are also wrong. Could someone with a bit more experience with wikipedia help correct this article? I'll help where I can. Thanks. 59.176.93.237 01:57, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Article Re-written

The Plot has been re-written ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Toprohan (talk • contribs) 18:21, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 01:37, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

...important?

A posibly important issue is that the article is written in a very unprofessional way. It is very jumpy, with numerous amount of sentence fragments. There are too many grammatical errors to be counted ("ringed") along with spelling ("Esha, Easha, Eesha"). Someone should fix this, preferably someone with better knowledge of the English language and the movie, plus enough time to clean this up. Thank you! --DMP47 (talk) 23:37, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Wrong director

In the page the wrong director is showing because Heyy Babyy film was not maked by this Sajid Khan but this Sajid_Khan(director)

• http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2012857/
• http://www.chakpak.com/celebrity/sajid-khan/22229

plz correct the information of both side that writer,director and playback singer--Ukhome (talk) 08:45, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Heyy Babyy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/features/2007/07/30/2896/index.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080521013130/http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/features/2007/10/01/3082/index.html to http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/features/2007/10/01/3082/index.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070912071605/http://www.apunkachoice.com/scoop/bollywood/20070824-4.html to http://www.apunkachoice.com/scoop/bollywood/20070824-4.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081208121547/http://www.aol.in/bollywood/story/2007082409269019000001/index.html to http://www.aol.in/bollywood/story/2007082409269019000001/index.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070824035354/http://www.indiafm.com/trade/boxoffice_update/index.html to http://www.indiafm.com/trade/boxoffice_update/index.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070624184323/http://www.indiafm.com/trade/overseas_boxoffice/index.html to http://www.indiafm.com/trade/overseas_boxoffice/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:38, 1 April 2017 (UTC)