Talk:Hendrix (disambiguation)

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Jenks24 in topic Requested move
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

Requested move edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 12:30, 10 November 2012 (UTC)Reply



HendrixHendrix (disambiguation) – I propose making "Hendrix" a redirect to "Jimi Hendrix". I believe that Jimi gets more page views than all of the other Hendrix surnames and articles named Hendrix combined. Hoops gza (talk) 01:30, 25 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

  • Support. If a DAB title has a parenthetical, readers are less likely to mistake it for an actual article. Kauffner (talk) 16:29, 25 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose Jimi Hendrix is known as just Jimi Hendrix, not as Hendrix. Furthermore, Jimi Hendrix is dead and interest for him will slowly get less; "Hendrix" will probably slowly gain articles. Lova Falk talk 11:42, 28 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Comment: the argument about the dab having a parenthetical to avoid confusion is contrary to the consensus for placement of dabs with no primary topic. I'd be happy to support this, though, if the OP or someone wants to go check the page views to confirm their belief. -- JHunterJ (talk) 18:51, 1 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Comment: Right-o. All things Hendrix not including Jimi (not just the surname but the disambiguation page as well) sums to 58,347 page views in the past 30 days. Jimi Hendrix has 254,468 page views over that same time span.Hoops gza (talk) 23:34, 1 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Support as noted with the numbers. -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:35, 2 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.