This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Helen Purchase is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.
In what way is this person "notable" according to the Wikipedia definition..?! If she is, then so are pretty much all academics in the world. Can't see any prestigious awards or seminal contributions to research... — Preceding unsigned comment added by RichardThePict (talk • contribs) 14:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments3 people in discussion
Subject heavily editing and article on their person Alexf(talk) 10:08, 29 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hello Alex: yes, this is true, I have updated the information on my own Wikipedia page. The page was created by someone else some time ago - and was not up to date.
I am new to Wikipedia: it did not seem right to me to have a wikipedia page under my name that was incorrect. Can you advise me please: should I have asked someone else to do the edits for me so that the information is correct (but that it did not look like I was updating it myself?)
I have removed the information that is not relevant to my status as an academic computing scientist.
You should not be editing this article, except to remove egregious errors or unsourced defamation; see WP:AUTOBIO. Instead, if you think the coverage of your accomplishments is inadequate or out of date, you should make requests for changes here on this talk page. Please keep in mind that we can only include information from published sources. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:00, 30 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks David, this information is very useful indeed - I did not understand. What do you advise that I do now? Simply revert the page to what it was a week ago? Would that be the best thing to do? Best wishes. Helen Purchase (talk) 01:36, 1 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=logo}
