Talk:Hard Punishments
 | A fact from Hard Punishments appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 February 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Comment edit
I am having a chapter of Willa Cather and France: In Search of the Lost Language (Robert J. Nelson; 1988) digitized by my library, almost certainly very helpful. I probably won't have it in the next few weeks, though. I don't imagine many Cather scholars will come across this page - but if any of you do and have access before I add anything, that would be lovely. Urve (talk) 10:45, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Did you know nomination edit
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 19:30, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
... that Willa Cather's final novel, Hard Punishments, was almost entirely destroyed after her death?- ALT1:... that while Willa Cather asked for her final novel, Hard Punishments, to be destroyed when she died, new fragments were discovered in 2011?
ALT2:... that while Willa Cather asked for her final novel to be destroyed when she died, new fragments were recently uncovered?ALT3:... that Willa Cather's final novel, Hard Punishments, was centered on two disfigured boys in medieval Avignon?
- Reviewed: Exempt (only one previous nomination)
Created by Urve (talk). Self-nominated at 10:35, 8 February 2021 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
| QPQ: None required. |
Overall: 
Urve, thanks for the interesting article! The hooks are all great; I prefer ALT1 because it includes the new fragments and no qualms about whether 2011 is still recent. Just a couple comments/questions: 1) The name "Cather's Avignon story" needs a citation. 2) The article says "...which many understand to be lesbian" but cites a single scholar. I think the phrase should be revised or sources should be added to substantiate the use of "many". 3) The hook labels it as her "final novel" but the article doesn't explicitly indicate that. Could you add that fact to the article along with a source? Hopefully these aren't too hard to address. Best, DanCherek (talk) 04:36, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you very much, DanCherek. Your comments are very helpful - coming at the article from the perspective of a Cather scholar, there are some things I take for granted. I believe that I have addressed these issues. If we are good to go, then I would be happy to strike the other hooks but ALT1. Urve (talk) 13:57, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
