This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 04:04, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion
I see what appears to be an error in fact in this article, specifically in paragraph one, where Herr Driesch is credited with performing the world's first cloning. In today's context, cloning almost always refers to genetic cloning, where genetic information from a zygote is removed and replaced with the genetic information from another cell, and then the zygote is implanted or otherwise allowed to develop into a full term organism. In my humble opinion, Herr Driesch did not clone sea urchins, he twinned them, using a process called monozygotic twinning. This is the same process that creates identical twins in humans. Yes, this was an important discovery, but if you use that definition for cloning, then cloning has been around since the beginning of time. I suggest that the claim to first cloning be either changed or clarified. I would make the change, but I wanted someone with more knowledge than mine to weigh in on this. Thank you.
--Alex146 (talk) 01:43, 12 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
I have added a reference that explains the definition of cloning used. --Boson (talk) 10:03, 12 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
I appreciate your (Boson) response to my comment, in clarifying the reference to "cloning" as applied in 1885. Thank you. --Alex146 (talk) 20:19, 16 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
I hope my addition adequately addresses your concerns. --Boson (talk) 20:36, 16 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
It does. Thank you. As suggested, I moved this discussion from the WikiProject Germany Discussion page, where I had originally incorrectly posted it, to its proper location. --Alex146 (talk) 21:46, 17 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
I've put quotes round the term cloning in the lead, just to alert the reader that they may need to read the reference. (Peter Ells (talk) 14:09, 8 January 2014 (UTC))Reply
