Talk:Hanns Scharff

Trying to reach the main author of this article

Hello,

I'm a journalist and was very impressed by this article on Hans-Joachim Scharff. Well done -- truly.

If possible, I've very much like to contact the main author of the article -- I've just got one or two quick questions. I can be reached at eyewitness@earthlink.net

Thanks very much.

Regards,

Josh —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.174.181.78 (talk) 07:54, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you, and I've emailed you so be on the lookout for it. The article is nowhere near finished, but other priorities have put finishing it on the backburner. I estimate I'm only about 1/3-1/2 of the way done with the text, and then I need to add the photos. Thanks for your interest. --ScreaminEagle (talk) 15:51, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Incorrect data, from the reference material itself

Claude Stokes was definitely not a 58th victim of Red Baron, neither he was killed by him at all. Capt. (not-Lt.Col.) Claude Stokes was the last allied fighter pilot shot down in the WWI (7.11.18). The relation to Margaret is unknown to me. Question is, who did make up this 'legend'.

To whomever wrote this comment, would you be willing to contact me via my talk page since you are not a registered user and I have no other way of contacting you? Thank you for the heads-up--I've done quite a bit more research as a result. --ScreaminEagle (talk) 20:16, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Reference

The link to the fifth reference doesn't lead to anything right now. If it doesn't work later on, please delete it.

~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bestmj33001 (talk • contribs) 01:13, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

This article might be a hoax

There is no mention of this man in the German Wikipedia. If they themselves do not make an article about this person, what does that tell us? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8388:540:9900:71E4:75DE:11A9:E465 (talk) 07:37, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hanns Scharff. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060721230837/http://www.slweekly.com/editorial/2005/feat_2005-03-10.cfm to http://www.slweekly.com/editorial/2005/feat_2005-03-10.cfm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060501112748/http://www.mcitta.org/scharff0505.htm to http://www.mcitta.org/scharff0505.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071012140824/http://www.ocweekly.com/news/talk/the-good-soldier/15299/ to http://www.ocweekly.com/news/talk/the-good-soldier/15299/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:53, 29 October 2017 (UTC)