Talk:Hamza al-Mustapha

Spam warning

Sorry I don't know Wikipedia better, but this article should be checked for vandalism. The spammer may have changed it to make it match the scam more closely. Also, Wikipedia should have a quick-response mechanism to cut such spammers off at their knees. It would probably be sufficient if the warning were added for a day or two and was automatically removed. However, if they want to get fancy about it, maybe they could add a tool to compare the scam to the article and look for vandalism around the matching sections... The spammers don't care how much of Wikipedia's reputation they destroy, if only they can con one more sucker. Shanen (talk) 07:21, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hamza al-Mustapha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120320175308/http://nationalmirroronline.net/news/11745.html to http://nationalmirroronline.net/news/11745.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120202075639/http://www.thenationonlineng.net/2011/index.php/news/35181-al-mustapha-to-die-for-kudirat%E2%80%99s-murder.html to http://www.thenationonlineng.net/2011/index.php/news/35181-al-mustapha-to-die-for-kudirat%E2%80%99s-murder.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:12, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Serious Concerns about the need for a CSO infobox and other embellishments

I don't see the rationale for an Chief Security Officer Infobox addition to this article. Most Wikipedia articles with Infoboxes are for positions (not people) with undisputed notability such as Country leaders, sovereigns, CEOs etc. I think the test for notability for the CSO Infobox rests on whether we can identify the CSOs who preceded Al Mustapha and after. So why the need for an Infobox for the office? The subject is already notable considering the notoriety he received however I fail to see why a CSO infobox is needed. I will address embellishments at a later time Kunkuru (talk) 23:51, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Rate

I rated this with C-class based on his career in military. (F5pillar---/ ^{'Messager🖋📩}) 15:45, 25 August 2020 (UTC)