Talk:HMS Fidelity (D57)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Special Service Vessel

edit

The introduction here said that Fidelity "was a Special Service Vessel (Q-Ship)" and the infobox gave her type as "Q-ship". I’ve changed that; a Q-Ship is (or was) an anti-submarine warfare vessel acting as a decoy in order to engage (and hopefully destroy) a submarine in the act of trying to sink her. There is no indication Fidelity was ever employed in this role. She was on special service, but initially in her role with SOE and later as a Commando landing ship. Although Q-Ships were classed as Special Service Vessels, not all SSV’s were Q-Ships, and the statement here is an assumption, not a verifiable fact. Xyl 54 (talk) 23:39, 30 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on HMS Fidelity (D57). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:13, 27 October 2017 (UTC)Reply