Talk:H-110 Sarir (UAV)

Latest comment: 5 years ago by RJFJR

This aircraft cannot be called an unmanned combat air vehicle, or UCAV, because UCAV is a technical term describing a blended wing body with internal weapons storage. The annual Pentagon unmanned systems roadmap is the best guide to terminology here.

Claims that Sarir is a stealth aircraft are patently false. Stealth is a 'holding pen' term used to describe a combination of signature reduction techniques applied as a coherent system to reduce optical, radar, noise and heat signatures. There is no evidence of any of these techniques being applied to the Sarir design. Construction from composite materials alone does not constitute stealth capabilities; if it were then the Boeing Dreamliner will have to start being called a stealth aircraft.

Lastly, the design has uncanny parallels with the IAI-Northrop Grumman Hunter UAV, and the possibility that the system is in fact reverse engineered from US Army aircraft lost in Iran and Afghanistan is worth examining.

moved to H-110 Sarir (UAV) RJFJR (talk) 18:48, 29 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on H-110 Sarir (UCAV). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:27, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply