Talk:Gujarati literature

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Gazal world in topic Reformist Era & Scholar Era

Orphaned references in Gujarati literature edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Gujarati literature's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "eth":

  • From Bengali language: "Statistical Summaries". Ethnologue. 2005. Retrieved 2007-03-03. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |rank= ignored (help)
  • From Sindhi language: Sindhi language at Ethnologue
  • From Gujarati language: Gordon 2005

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 13:13, 27 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Help! edit

Can somebody help me find an editable version of the first paragraph of this article? It needs copy editing, but does not appear on the "Edit" screen for some reason. Thanks in advance. --Remotelysensed (talk) 17:38, 7 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gujarati literature. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:30, 25 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Reformist Era & Scholar Era edit

The writers, listed in 'Reformist Era', like Govardhanram Tripathi, Ramanbhai Nilkanth, Narsinhrao Divetia, Kant and Navalram Pandya are actually belong to 'Scholar Era'. While Narmad, Dalpatram, Mahipatram Nilkanth etc. are belong to Reformist Era. Though both era are intermixed with each-other, there are a little difference between them. Also, the both sections don't focus on the activities of writers and their aims of writing. So, We should rewritten both section with suitable references.

One other thing I notices is that, 'Scholar Era' or 'Govardhan Era' is also known by 'Manilal-Govardhanram Era', named after Manilal Dwivedi and Govardhanram Tripathi. The current section of 'Scholar era' does not mention Manilal. -Gazal world (talk) 06:57, 1 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Pinged Nizil Shah. --Gazal world (talk) 18:16, 4 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Gazal world:. Well, the Eras overlap. The writers cited above should be recategorised as you suggested. I think that naming eras after people is somewhat problematic and injustice to the other notable people of the era so we better title it as Scholar Era. There is a need of better title instead of Gandhi Era as well. I want to rewrite whole article when time comes. :) -Nizil (talk) 06:31, 5 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Nizil Shah: This one will also be useful. -Gazal world (talk) 19:05, 2 January 2019 (UTC)Reply