Source

edit

This article seems to be a direct summary of the company's own info page:

http://www.grundfos.com/web/grfosweb.nsf

I'll leave it to someone else to make the correct changes, as I dont think this is per wikipedia quality standard.

I agree with your comments above. Some parts are true but most is marketing rubbish at which Grundfos truly excel. I have made some changes based on insider knowledge but I can't quote 'facts' as not all is in the public domain. Offbeam (talk) 12:34, 10 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
The article about Grundfos contains exclusively facts about Grundfos. Grundfos is constantly working on optimising all processes throughout the group. The thorough optimisation are serving both the customers and the business.
None of the comments made by "Offbeam" are factual - as he says himself. To maintain the high quality standard and credibility of Wikipedia, I suggest that such allegations are rejected. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Constantinobel (talkcontribs) 09:33, 8 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
I have to disagree with Constatinobel (who I suspect is Danish and biased)- I said the comments were not in the public domain - not they were not factual.
Grundfos have a large number of employees and supporters who believe the company can do no wrong - they will continue to edit this page to reflect corporate image rather than the truth. They would do well to read the ITT Lowara wiki entry which is more factual - and much more interesting than the Grundfos one currently which is largely corporate mumbo jumbo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Offbeam (talkcontribs) 20:03, 11 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:09, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply