Talk:Greg London

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

General content

edit

Delete excess, encyclopedic format and language. Fayenatic london 22:55, 9 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Info box, image upload completion. Monika London (talk)

edit

Tagishsimon (talk) 03:22, 31 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm back, lending a more experienced hand this time. Despite the "london" in my user name I have no conflict of interest. - Fayenatic (talk) 21:20, 31 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Edited talk Monika London (talk) 19:58, 23 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

More sources

edit

Alias substantiation, Greg Franks: Pebble Beach, Calif., Singer a Hit on the Corporate Circuit (http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-53141468.html), Entertainer of the Year 2001 (http://www.event-solutions.com/spotlight_awards/spotlight_award_recipients/2001_st_louis). Note the artist no longer wishes to be known by this name. Monika London (talk) 18:40, 13 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

OK, I've added those refs to the article. The article needs to mention the name he was known by at the time, otherwise the sources wouldn't make sense. - Fayenatic (talk) 20:00, 17 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

AC Radio debut

edit

Monika London (talk) 06:42, 9 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

New Format

edit

Added new content and their respective references.Monika London (talk) 12:48, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I put it into chronological order, and added a focus sentence in the lead paragraph. (Couldn't sleep!) - Fayenatic (talk) 02:17, 12 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Notable Miscellaneous

edit

There is currently as section headed "Notable Miscellaneous" containing 4 paragraphs, none of which appear either self-explanatory or notable. I am leaving this comment as a prompt to improve them, otherwise the whole section should be deleted. - Fayenatic (talk) 20:23, 29 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hit singles

edit

The section on hit singles is too long, too detailed, and most of the sources are press-releases rather than articles or other edited coverage. That means that they are not sufficiently good sources for Wikipedia articles; see WP:SELFPUBLISHED. Please look for better sources.- Fayenatic (talk) 21:23, 2 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

It's looking better now -- good work. I have added a dated citation for #5 on FMQB AC40. - Fayenatic (talk) 12:50, 5 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Greg London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:46, 25 March 2017 (UTC)Reply