Talk:Graeme Catto

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

It seems that an obsessive special interest group has gone through this entry, adding the blogged views of David Colquhoun. I've taken them out because I don't think his blog stands up as good source for wikipedia - it's a blog, not a notable publication, and some of the assertions are merely gossip, not substantiated fact. People wanting to make points about the College of Medicine would be much better drawing from the BMJ as their source material - being careful however to quote the arguments that occurred there on both sides - e.g. http://www.bmj.com/content/343/bmj.d4364.extract and http://www.bmj.com/content/341/bmj.c6126.extract.

I've not added these myself as I'm far from convinced that they are an important point of interest in a still relatively short biography of Graeme Catto's long career. If someone begs to differ though, they ought to be quoting balanced well regarded sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.33.29.104 (talk) 15:13, 24 August 2011 (UTC) (78.33.29.104 (talk) 15:16, 24 August 2011 (UTC)).Reply

You'll note that the text you removed also relied on a Guardian article and your second BMJ link as sources, Colquhoun's blog was not the sole source material. The College of Medicine is controversial, as evidenced by these sources, and any mention of Catto's appointment should address this, per notability. Colquhoun also appears to have addressed his concerns in a letter to the BMJ, which would seem to satisfy your criteria for sources. Randomnonsense (talk) 02:07, 28 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for restoring that information, Randomnonsense. I hadn't noticed it had been (spuriously) removed. Famousdog (talk) 09:47, 30 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Graeme Catto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:58, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply