Talk:Gombe, Nigeria

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gombe, Gombe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071001045202/http://world-gazetteer.com/wg.php?x=&men=gpro&lng=en&dat=32&geo=-158&srt=pnan&col=dq&pt=a&va=x&geo=361063117 to http://world-gazetteer.com/wg.php?x=&men=gpro&lng=en&dat=32&geo=-158&srt=pnan&col=dq&pt=a&va=x&geo=361063117
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091007011423/http://www.nipost.gov.ng/PostCode.aspx to http://www.nipost.gov.ng/PostCode.aspx
• Added {{dead link}} tag to https://ca.news.yahoo.com/bomb-kills-one-wounds-18-north-eastern-nigerias-gombe-210217235.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:03, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 4 December 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved to "Gombe, Nigeria" —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 04:39, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

---

Gombe, Gombe → Gombe, Nigeria – Since Gombe is a disambiguation page, 'Nigeria' should be added so as not to make the page name seem like it's repeated. Josedimaria237 (talk) 18:39, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

• Comment The current title is correct per WP:PLACEDAB, however, I believe that policy needs improvement. See discussion at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (geographic names)#WP:PLACEDAB and disambiguating by state/province. 162 etc. (talk) 22:24, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

@162 etc.: The article's title is not correct. In Nigeria, the commonly used name is 'Gombe, Gombe State' but since this is Wikipedia, 'Gombe, Nigeria' should be used. Josedimaria237 (talk) 15:45, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the insight on local common usage. Per the current version of WP:PLACEDAB, "when (disambiguation) tags are required for places in (...) Nigeria, (...) use the name of the state (...) if the place lies within a single such entity." This would lead us to the title of Gombe, Gombe State. "Gombe, Nigeria" seems like a fine title, but it contradicts the current policy; I urge all that are interested to have a look at the discussion I linked above. 162 etc. (talk) 17:42, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

• Support there is more than 1 capital so something like Gombe (capital) wouldn't be an option so this somewhat avoids the repetition. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:39, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

@Crouch, Swale: 'Gombe, Nigeria' is more acceptable. In Nigeria, the state is referred to as Gombe State not Gombe. Josedimaria237 (talk) 15:41, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Yes I'd also support that, I see you're changed the request to the country. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:20, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.