Talk:Glomerulus (kidney)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by IiKkEe in topic Help with reducing image please


Requested move 20 April 2015 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) Calidum T|C 05:03, 6 May 2015 (UTC)Reply


Glomerulus (kidney)Glomerulus – Far and away the term readers will be looking for when they search for 'glomerulus' is the one in the kidney. The page currently at 'glomerulus' should be moved to 'glomerulus (diamgbiguation). --Relisted. George Ho away from home (talk) 20:16, 29 April 2015 (UTC) Tom (LT) (talk) 12:22, 20 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

  • Support both moves. A search for 'glomerulus' would be almost always for the renal glomerulus. --Tilifa Ocaufa (talk) 02:20, 24 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose both moves. The pages are easily navigable as they are now. "Glomerulus" is a type of structure, not just the one in the kidney. The kidney glomerulus is not the primary meaning of the word "glomerulus", thus a disambiguation page needs to be used. -Iamozy (talk) 17:03, 1 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose, in agreement with Iamozy. --Iztwoz (talk) 17:47, 1 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose. A topic as specialized as this requires disambiguation per WP:CRITERIA: Recognizability – The title is a name or description of the subject that someone familiar with, although not necessarily an expert in, the subject area will recognize. Zarcadia (talk) 18:52, 1 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Help with reducing image please edit

As above: a skill I have not acquired. IiKkEe (talk) 15:35, 17 September 2017 (UTC)Reply