Talk:Glenford Spencer

Latest comment: 5 months ago by Cameron Dewe in topic Shallow references fail verification

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Glenford Spencer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:56, 16 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Glenford Spencer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:28, 18 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Shallow references fail verification edit

I have tagged four shallow references as failing verification. References should be deep links to the specific page on a website that contain the information that is being used to verify the claim in the article. The page obtained by following the citation's URL should provide the facts that are needed to verify an article's claims. A URL to a website that is only selling a book that contains the information is not really appropriate. If the website provides information about a book that you know contains the information, such as the book's title, author, publisher and ISBN, then cite the book, directly, not the website URL of the web-page advertising or selling the book. However, website URL's that provide a book preview, quick-read or even a summary might be acceptable provided they contain the appropriate information needed for verifying the article. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 12:45, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply