Talk:Girl Genius

Separate pages for detailed plot and character information?

Given the length and complexity of GG, does it make sense to break out a plot article and a character article? - ClaireJV (talk) 06:19, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

It looks like this article is much better off just getting a trim. It seems to me the entire plot and character section is original research based on primary sources. I don't think a "List of Girl Genius characters" article would make GNG, though if you can find the sources, go ahead. ~Mable (chat) 09:37, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

I just gave the article a very heavy trim. It probably still contains a lot of unnecessary detail, and I may have accidentally deleted some useful information, but overall, the article is definitely much better now. ~Mable (chat) 09:43, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Girl Genius. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070808201201/http://www.comic-con.org/cci/cci_eisners_07nom.shtml to http://www.comic-con.org/cci/cci_eisners_07nom.shtml
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090219141046/http://www.comic-con.org:80/cci/cci_eisners_05nom.shtml to http://www.comic-con.org/cci/cci_eisners_05nom.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:02, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Girl Genius. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://girlgeniuscomic.livejournal.com/261579.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070313103808/http://kajafoglio.livejournal.com/60562.html to http://kajafoglio.livejournal.com/60562.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150523050757/http://haus-of-klaus.livejournal.com/25974.html to http://haus-of-klaus.livejournal.com/25974.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://community.livejournal.com/haus_of_klaus/9295.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.comic-con.org/cci/cci_eisners_05nom.shtml
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160202020217/http://girlgenius-lab.livejournal.com/ to http://girlgenius-lab.livejournal.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:50, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Girl Genius. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080723170551/http://www.snellsoftware.com/briansnoddyart to http://www.snellsoftware.com/briansnoddyart/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090221121055/http://prismcomics.org/profile.php?id=50 to http://prismcomics.org/profile.php?id=50

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:25, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Reassessed quality

I have reranked this article from Start-class to C-class, but consider it does not make B-class. It does a reasonable job of covering the subject but still has a long way to go to reasonably cover setting, plot, and characters in a way that is appropriately sourced. HenryCrun15 (talk) 04:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC)