This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
No need for specific assertion as his (non-trivial) publications were listed. However, specific assertion is now added along with link to a Sunday Times article featuring him. --ROGER DAVIEStalk 00:58, 8 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
Well, there's very little way to tell what the difference between trivial and non-trivial publications without contextual reference and specific assertion, but I'm just glad to see the entry begin to look encyclopedic. When I tag CSD, most people just try to eliminate the tag and argue me down. You actually improved the article. I'm impressed. I think that's the first time that's happened. Chromancer (talk) 14:33, 11 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
A clue might be in the title–Worthless Men: Race, eugenics and the death penalty in the British Army during the First World War–and the fact the author is described as a social and cultural historian :) But I take your point, my stubs aren't usually this scrappy. And thanks for your kind words :) --ROGER DAVIEStalk 16:28, 11 December 2007 (UTC)Reply