Talk:George Gardiner (settler)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on George Gardiner (settler). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20111206161359/http://www.rilin.state.ri.us:80/RhodeIslandHistory/ to http://www.rilin.state.ri.us/RhodeIslandHistory/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:35, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Origin and Marriages

I already made the edit but I want this to be on record on the Talk page in case it comes up again. We have two sources for the origin and claimed early marriage of George Gardiner. The first was a self-published family genealogy, and they appear to have simply found someone named George Gardiner and concluded he must be the same person, a name's-the-same assumption all too common among non-critical genealogists. The second was a published scholarly journal article written by one of the premier professional genealogists in the US, and he concluded there was no evidence whatsoever to support the assumption this was the same George, and chronology strongly disfavored it. Based on policy, self-published material is not considered reliable, and we simply must frame our description from the perspective of this published, scholarly, expert opinion and not to the self-published speculation, as the preferred reconstruction. George's origin is unknown, there is no evidence he had a spouse before Herodias. Agricolae (talk) 23:42, 21 November 2019 (UTC)