Talk:George-Emmanuel Lazaridis

File:GEL - detailed bio 1.png Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:GEL - detailed bio 1.png, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:GEL - detailed bio 1.png) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:50, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

File:George Emmanuel Lazaridis 1.png Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:George Emmanuel Lazaridis 1.png, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:George Emmanuel Lazaridis 1.png) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 05:20, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Should everyone be allowed to mess up someone else’s Wikipedia profile with no obligation to report on their actions?

I am herewith voicing my concern that Wikipedia, even if a marvellous idea, is actually becoming a field for uncontrolled (and uncontrollable) arbitrariness - sometimes, even malicious arbitrariness. I’ve seen so many pages having literally been massacred with uni formed interventions by people who simply do not wish to do their proper research before taking on the responsibility of becoming someone else’s life’s and achievement’s editor! It’s easy to remove references, it’s harder to investigate and improve them. Setting this Wikipedia page as an example, which I’ve seen being messed about since over a decade now and is currently looking a little short of “raped”, I’m raising a serious concern that there should be, at the end of the line, a serious, educated and duly authorised regulator for every Wikipedia page. One thought for the community to consider. UnitedMusicians (talk) 17:35, 30 November 2022 (UTC)