Talk:Georg Nees
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Heike2019 in topic Link to a Gallery for profit undo
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 12 January 2011. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Link to a Gallery for profit undo
editHello, I chance the link for "Kubo-Octaeder by Rase" to a neutral link: http://dada.compart-bremen.de/item/artwork/1029 data.compart-bremen, Kubo-Octaeder. The undo link is by a Gallery in Germany.
This is from the University Bremen: "compArt | center of excellence digital art” is a project at the University of Bremen, Germany.[1] .--Maxim Pouska (talk) 07:25, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Before the quoted website was a "Gallery for profit" it was an ordinary internet publication by a collector. Think it would be fair to quote this webpage - where this specific information was taken from - via the Internet Archive: [2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.217.38.199 (talk) 11:55, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- Hello IP - all information on this subject comes from the book: Herbert W. Franke, Computergraphik - Computerkunst, Computer Graphics - Computer Art, Second Edition, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo, 1985, Page 147-149. The book is in front of me on my desk. So that the information is easier to find online today, I have used the web address of the page, which was inspired by Frieder Nake at the UNI Bremen. I appreciate the work of Heike Werner very much, have known the site for years, but as a reference the website is not the best choice for WP. Sorry.--Maxim Pouska (talk) 18:15, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- Ps Why the link is not usable for WP can be found on the page WP: COI.--Maxim Pouska (talk) 06:36, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
- Dear Maxim. Computer Art, Second Edition, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo, 1985, is also on my desk and Page 147-149 is on architecture (very good source, indeed, I didn´t claim that all of the architecture info is from my page …) but this chapter does not mention the Kubo-Oktaeder at all … the composition of this motif was part of my own research. The correct title of this motif is actually: Kubo-Oktaeder (or translated: Cuboctahedron). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heike2019 (talk • contribs) 12:06, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- Dear Heike2019. Please take a look at this WP:V. There you will find information about why your link can not be used. Best.--Maxim Pouska (talk) 20:32, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- Why not delete the last sentence with the link to Hamburger Kunsthalle then, it is not so important and now you have no source for that.
- btw it is great how you promote your friend AK as a (German digital) artist with long articles on Wikipedia, although he is not even in the dada.compart-bremen database and relatively unknown in Germany. What do the WP rules say about that, using wiki-edit-power for friends? Thank you for fighting my little footnote so hard, this gave me some insight. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heike2019 (talk • contribs) 09:04, 8 September 2019 (UTC)