Talk:Gann Academy

Not encyclopedic

Students often have uneasy feelings about the school and feel that the Administration is getting stricter and the school more prep-like. Many students say that since transfering to the new campus, the school has lost its "New Jew" feel - a reference to the open (the freedom to leave during the day) urban campus necesitated by the office building space (lacking a cafeteria) as well as the tight community fostered by the akward, small and unique building. An example of this were the student lounges in the Fleet building, which anchored the hallways and were central to social life, compared to them in the new campus which are often seen as uncomfortable and seperate from the daily life of the school. Nevertheless, the school's student body has increased every year since it's opening.

Not encyclopedic. Deleted.--Wasabe3543 14:20, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

What exactly makes it not encyclopedic. Maybe it wasn't written well, but the opinion of transition in the social nature of a school by its students seems to be one of the most important things one could say about it. I've reverted to original. Please clarify your concerns. --FluteyFlakes88 02:36, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

It's essentially original research:

Original research refers to material added to articles by Wikipedia editors that has not been published already by a reputable source. In this context it means unpublished theories, data, statements, concepts, arguments, and ideas; or any new interpretation, analysis, or synthesis of published data, statements, concepts, arguments that, in the words of Wikipedia's founder Jimbo Wales, would amount to a "novel narrative or historical interpretation".

Find a reputable source, wikify, and cite.--Wasabe3543 03:10, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

This article is essentially original research, in the sense that is a composition of materials unlocated elsewhere, by that definition. The text of that section was the editing of the section that currently existed so I'm not sure what it's original sources are. The sentiments expressed can be verified in print in the school's paper Shevuon HaTichon. This on top of multiple personal interviews conducted by author. --FluteyFlakes88 03:47, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

The other info is available for the most part over the web, either at the Gann web site or at the Jewish Advocate, Boston Globe, etc. (I don't deny that specific details in the article may not be verifiable, but that entire paragraph in particular was the most obvious.) However, multiple personal interviews=original research. Original research that creates primary sources is not allowed. Additionally, burden of evidence lies with the editor who has made the edit, which in this case is you, since you made the revert. Either link to the Shevuon article or get rid of it. --Wasabe3543 04:21, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

As far as I'm aware it doesn't exist on the internet. Futhermore, the 'interviews' were not done for the purpose of creating this article but were an experiential aspect of the general zeitgeist of the school. This isn't a case of original research being gathered here, but of largely unknown and irrelevent (relatively) local knowledge being presented for the first time extralocally. --FluteyFlakes88 04:28, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

The context of the interviews doesn't matter. "largely unknown and irrelevent (relatively) local knowledge being presented for the first time extralocally" is original research, and Wikipedia is not the place for it.--Wasabe3543 04:44, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

I've gone through the archives of the paper (tangible) and located it. The first of many published pieces on it is from the September 8th, 2004 issue, titled "Things Have Changed". I see no reason why this publication shouldn't be considered valid source material. --FluteyFlakes88 04:52, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Within the Jewish community of Massachusetts this is public knowledge with many including alumni speaking about this. The issues of the Fleet bank building vs. the building today has been published in multiple sources. These articles were printed and were available to all those that took the time to find it. Just because the school may be good at hiding it doesn't mean that it is not there. --Chalutz 15:55, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Please Clarify

The last paragraph contains the following phrase: "the only option for most students who are not allowed off campus." Is it that all students are not allowed off campus, or some students are not allowed off campus (whereas some are)? Thanks, Reuvenk 05:06, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Seniors are allowed off camus if their parents fill out a form, all other students are restricted.

Lopsided

As an alum I was surprised at the size of this article. However, it is in need of major restructuring.

Firstly, I am merging the second paragraph of the introduction into the History. This paragraph was: The school recently moved into its new and current building at 333 Forest Street, the third building the school has inhabited. The school's original location was at 60 Turner Street in Waltham, adjacent to the campus of Brandeis University in a building owned by the University. Its second location was rented space in an office building shared with Fleet Bank (BankBoston at time of move in) at the intersection of Prospect and Main Streets in downtown Waltham. Not just is it misplaced, but it is in reverse chronoligical order and an incomplete history.

Secondly, there is a lot of latent and apparent bias in the article, along with all the original research as mentioned above. "Well known", "faithfully served", "top of the line", and "_____ is dedicated to ____" are all inappropriate (Well known would be fine if there were multiple citations, but there weren't any). The current quibblings of the student body are not appropriate for this article, even if the Advocate chooses to publish something on it. Same with stuff like the striking of the club hour from the Thursday schedule. There was no section on why the club hour went from twice to once a week (and rightfully so, because it's not a concern), and its complete removal should not be mentioned either. There was also a lot of original research in that section and its only citation was an editorial. I have removed many blatantly biased sentences and phrasings and I'll try to check up from time to time.

Thirdly, the lopsidedness. There is a huge section on technology (which I'll be reducing) and no section on Exploration Week. This is just too lopsided. I am not currently attending NewJew, so I can't actually add anything, but I call on a current student to please add this section. Talk about what Exploration week is, what the purpose/goals of EW are, and give a brief list of a few of the options available. The same should be done for the junior trip to Israel (again, you can mention that it was once a senior trip, but there is no need to discuss the board/parent/headmaster conflict).

There is also no section on Shevuon Hatichon, which should have at least one sentence on it.

While the section laying out the weekly schedule is fine, there is no information on the Beit Midrash or how courses work (both religious and secular offerings). There should be information on this too.

Once this is done I think we can get rid of the cleanup sign, but not until then.Tdmg 00:39, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

speaking of lopsided make sure to talk about the back of the red cross where the drugs flowed freely and of course lets not forget that during exploration week the amount of drinking that takes place due to lack of organized nightly activity. - Chalutz

I believe all of that would be original research. If there was an article on the "Gann drug problems" that mentioned such issues, then it would be noteworthy. Otherwise it's not appropriate for this article. However, I believe there is a lot of published material on the school that should be here. --Tdmg 14:30, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Sports

Moved from article:

'Someone should add something about the sports teams and when they won championships, such as in 2002 when the boys soccer team won an overtime thriller by beating CSW 3-2 in a penalty shootout on the 7th shot with a save by Josh Bock. Regulation goals were scored that day by Uri Nurko and Daniel Packer. The following year, the boys repeated against the Waring School 1-0 with Tomer Radbil scoring the lone goal.' -- 66.31.159.171

I do not know if such detail is necessary, but something about sports should be mentioned. Not to say that there should only be a few sentences, but the section's concentration shouldn't be basketball, but sports in general. --Tdmg 14:22, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Moved from article (again): 'Someone should add something about the sports teams and when they won championships, such as in 2002 when the boys soccer team won an overtime thriller by beating CSW 3-2 in a penalty shootout on the 7th shot with a save by Josh Bock. Regulation goals were scored that day by Uri Nurko and Daniel Packer. The following year, the boys repeated against the Waring School 1-0 with Tomer Radbil scoring the lone goal. Also, the annual trip to Toronto to play in the Israel Becker basketball tournament should be noted, like when the girls won in 2006 and when the boys won in 2001.' Qqqqqq 04:24, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Redirection from Sitt/SITT

Why is it that when Sitt is searched the page gets redirected to this page? It should go to the page for Romantic Composer "Hans Sitt", it is more appropriate.

Fair use rationale for Image:Gann acad.JPG

Image:Gann acad.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Reversion of edits from IP:64.119.42.118

Just a quick note to let anyone interested know that [I have reverted] all edits by the user listed above. I have redone the edit by User:Rich Farmbrough, and I think the article is ok now, but, since I have minimal experience in this area, maybe someone who is watching the page (if any) might want to check it out and let me know is anything further is needed. Thatguyflint ^{Talk to me!} 21:17, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

That's the school IP adress, so blocking it might not bee too good. Not sure what you might do about that, because blocking that would mean blocking a whole community from editing.

Maximum927 (talk) 01:49, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Edit request from , 11 October 2011

Not enough info about school founders, namely Biggie Smalls and the bear from the Charmin commercials. Get this taken care of asap.

Cha cha cha, Charmin.

Jah0628 (talk) 00:54, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

 Not done Skier Dude (talk) 05:40, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Edit request on 2 December 2011

{{edit semi-protected}} Please add to the "Established" line in the box on the right 1997 by Rabbi Daniel Lehmann

Please add revise the second line of the beginning to the entry to the following: Founded in 1997 by Rabbi Daniel Lehmann as The New Jewish High School of Greater Boston, the school changed names in 2003 in honor of philanthropist Joseph Gann who donated $5,000,000 to the school.

Source:

Boston Globe

HIGH SCHOOL TO SERVE ALL JEWISH FAITHS Published on October 27, 1996 Author(s): Muriel Cohen, Globe correspondent

TAPPING A TREND NEW JEWISH SCHOOL TOUCHES A CHORD Published on December 8, 1997 Author(s): Diego Ribadeneira, Globe Staff

New Jewish High School sub-lets building from Brandeis Jewish Advocate - Boston Author: Gelbwasser, Michael Date: Nov 7, 1996

Lehmann46 (talk) 01:25, 2 December 2011 (UTC) It already says est. 1997. Which ref says the person established it?  Chzz  ►  07:03, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Boston Globe article is source for Daniel Lehmann as founding headmaster of Gann Academy. This can also easily be confirmed by calling the school at 781-642-6800. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.118.86.195 (talk) 01:30, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Edit request on 6 February 2012

{{edit semi-protected}}

Please remove the following sentence under the Technology subject as it is an inaccurate statement: Most of the computers are underwater and badly damaged, with rust coating 85 to 90 percent of all surfaces.

Thank you. Gannwiki (talk) 18:36, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

The page is now unprotected- go ahead and edit it yourself. tedder (talk) 18:41, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gann Academy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150202215757/http://www.gannacademy.org/Page/Admissions/Apply-Now/Affording-Gann to http://www.gannacademy.org/Page/Admissions/Apply-Now/Affording-Gann
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100823021218/http://www.gannacademy.org:80/arts/AthleticsProgram.asp to http://www.gannacademy.org/arts/AthleticsProgram.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:29, 7 January 2017 (UTC)