Talk:Galdr
 | A fact from Galdr appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 October 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.png){kind=small}
Men/Women edit
Referring to my knowledge, Galdr was and still is only pratice by men. Women have many other rituals and ceremonies, but the Runes and the Galdr is exclusively for men. You can refer to many Old Norse writings and documents, and of course, the Varg Vikernes' writings... —Preceding unsigned comment added by FenrisUlven (talk • contribs) 20:45, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Falsetto edit
I can find no existence of the sources cited as reference for the falsetto comment. I submit that it's a joke. -sG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sgecko (talk • contribs) 16:51, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Galdr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://wayback.vefsafn.is/wayback/20070910215457/http%3A//www.heimskringla.no/original/edda/skirnismal.php to http://www.heimskringla.no/original/edda/skirnismal.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:26, 10 October 2017 (UTC)