Talk:Gala Bingo Club, Tooting

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

About the building or the cinema? edit

I understand that this article was written by the British Cinema task force, which obviously makes sense as it used to be a cinema. But really I feel that this article should reflect more about the significance of the physical building - e.g. why is it Grade I listed compared to the Granada Woolwich which is only II*. As such this article should perhaps really be about the Gala Bingo Club - which used to be Granada Tooting, especially considering it was not Granada Tooting which is an asset of community value - it's the Bingo Club. To reflect this I will in the near future overhaul the page, please use this Talk comment to reflect on that further. Cielliere (talk) 23:11, 27 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

I think this is wrong. Nobody cares about the bingo club (or nightclub or whatever is happening in this building), the only thing of interest is the cinema building, and the article should retain its name. --Anvilaquarius (talk) 13:16, 13 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gala Bingo Club, Tooting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:32, 18 January 2018 (UTC)Reply