Talk:GWR Records

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Timtempleton in topic Guinness World Records

Guinness World Records

edit

The consensus is to use the hatnote:

Cunard (talk) 01:14, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

If @Georgia guy: feels there may be confusion over the name, then simply place a WP:HAT at the top of the article - there is never justification to discuss what the article is not about in the article itself. 109.147.240.10 (talk) 16:01, 15 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Some registered Wikipedian please reveal your opinions on the edit this user keeps reverting. Georgia guy (talk) 16:14, 15 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
Try putting in a WP:RFC 109.147.240.10 (talk) 16:25, 15 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Request for comment

edit

The article's subject is the record company GWR Records. Within the artcle's prose, should it be stated that it is not about the Guiness World Records? Should Guiness World Records be a hatnote on the article? 109.147.240.10 (talk) 12:40, 16 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

  • The bot asked me here. I propose the following wp:hatnote:
EllenCT (talk) 05:10, 19 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.