Talk:Future food technology

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Dialectric in topic Split

Food patch plasters edit

I cannot find refs for this in English, this may be a hoax. A search for C. Patrick Dann reveals very little hits and they appear to be copies of wiki content. I have removed this section as a possible hoax ([1]). --Hanyangprofessor2 (talk) 07:01, 24 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Split edit

I am not sure if 'Future food technology' is a notable topic in itself. Maybe the article just needs a better title, or maybe we should just merge the sections into subarticles and delete it? --Hanyangprofessor2 (talk) 07:02, 24 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Rather than split, I am going to merge this into food technology if no one objects. I plan to create a new section titled 'emerging technologies' or something similar.Dialectric (talk) 02:44, 4 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

New Editor edit

I am in a dispute with a new editor. This editor keeps adding a section that reads more like a college essay than actual encylopedic knowledge. In addition by claiming better food is organic is POV. In addition this article is about Future of food technology, current eating habits of the French do not fall within the scope of this article.--VVikingTalkEdits 13:25, 26 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Single purpose account continuing to revert edits back to the the issues mentioned above. I'm trying to take this to the talk page but the editor with whom I have a dispute with is not engaging.--VVikingTalkEdits 13:17, 30 July 2019 (UTC)Reply