Talk:Fresh expression
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Old talk edit
I've taken out the ibid, looks funny, maybe just delete the second last ref which points to the same ref? Circumspects (talk) 09:55, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
The article has been tweaked, but the advert template is stil there Circumspects (talk) 09:55, 11 November 2010 (UTC) (Does it still need to be there?)
- I think not - have taken the templates out and had a bit of a go at the substance of the article. Springnuts (talk) 22:34, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
2022 talk edit
I've updated the page so that the purpose, history, and values of Fresh Expressions are more clearly and easily understood. I've also removed the content that limited Fresh Expressions to a United Kingdom perspective since the movement is global in reach. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gmssspeed (talk • contribs) 21:28, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Return to Fresh Expressions edit
I do not understand why this page has been changed from Fresh Expressions which is actually what it is about, i.e. a specific organisation which used this phrase as a term of its own invention. I feel a return to this title would better explain how the term developed over the last twenty years from a specific initiative.Leutha (talk) 20:16, 18 February 2024 (UTC)