Talk:French Lick Resort
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Article split edit
The historic hotel needs to be split off into a separate article. It is quite notable on it's own and gets lost in this larger article. Vegaswikian (talk) 06:02, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
- each of the hotel articles provide much more detail than the summary provided here Rosalina523 (talk) 21:19, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on French Lick Resort Casino. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090923144223/http://www.insideindianabusiness.com:80/newsitem.asp?ID=32355 to http://www.insideindianabusiness.com/newsitem.asp?id=32355
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090923144223/http://www.insideindianabusiness.com:80/newsitem.asp?ID=32355 to http://www.insideindianabusiness.com/newsitem.asp?id=32355
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090923144223/http://www.insideindianabusiness.com:80/newsitem.asp?ID=32355 to http://www.insideindianabusiness.com/newsitem.asp?id=32355
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090923144223/http://www.insideindianabusiness.com:80/newsitem.asp?ID=32355 to http://www.insideindianabusiness.com/newsitem.asp?id=32355
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081211212107/http://www.orangecountyin.com:80/frenchlick.html to http://orangecountyin.com/frenchlick.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:48, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
NRHP category edit
@Bertrouf: Okay, so, it appears that this casino's building complex includes some NRHP listed properties, such as the French Lick Springs Hotel and the West Baden Springs Hotel; the casino is not, however, NRHP listed (it only dates to 2006), so I don't think it's appropriate to put this article in an NRHP category. (The articles about the two historic hotels already are, as they should be.) If you really feel strongly that the casino should be put in an NRHP category just by association with those two historic properties, then I'm not going to fight you on it, but I'm registering my disagreement so that other editors can potentially weigh in in the future. Also, if you insist, then a better category would be Category:National Register of Historic Places in Orange County, Indiana. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 14:56, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
- Hello, OK for your revert, only French Lick Springs Hotel is listed in NRHP, I agree. But please read again the page, it is titled Casino, but the article describes the resort complex. That article starts with "French Lick Resort is a resort complex...", a paragraph is about the hotel, another one about the golf and the interwiki goes to the french page complex. I suggest a subject' clarification. Bertrouf (talk) 15:02, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
- I agree that it's a bit of an edge case and that the correct handling isn't absolutely clear; I think it works better to exclude this page from the category, but, as I said, if you still feel strongly that you want to add it, I won't revert again. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 16:55, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
