Talk:Fort Southerland

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fort Southerland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070301173928/http://tps.cr.nps.gov:80/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=896&ResourceType=District to http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=896&ResourceType=District

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:23, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Fort Southerland/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 06:41, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

I'll take this one, comments to follow in next few days. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 06:41, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Sorry it took so long to come back to this, comments as follows.

Lead

• Fort Southerland was included...: suggest breaking the lead here to better differentiate between the historic and modern era.
  • Done

Construction

• They are generally referred to as forts: link forts?
  • Linked at the first mention of forts a bit earlier in the paragraph

Camden Expedition and modern history

• If the sources support it, perhaps add a one-liner to the end of the 2nd paragraph noting that there was (presumably) no further action in the area during the war.
  • I'm fairly sure this is accurate, but haven't seen anything in the sources, or in a couple other things I've checked
• The remains of three of the redoubts were obliterated: perhaps add to the start of the section something to the effect of "In the postwar period, the remains...}}}
  • Done
• Redoubt A, also known as Fort Lookout: for clarity and greater specificity, suggest stating this is the fourth of the redoubts.
  • Clarified
• Despite its original site south of the city, Camden's growth has expanded to the north and west sites of the site.: I am uncertain about the construction of this sentence, particularly the usage of "Despite". I think effectively you are saying the growth of the city to the north and west meant that Fort Southerland, being the southernmost of the original redoubts, is the best preserved.
  • Significantly reworked
    • Wow, I really misunderstood the original sentence. It is much clearer now. Zawed (talk) 09:43, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
• The first sentence of the 4th para is really long and convoluted, suggest breaking it up.
  • Done
• Describing the destruction of the earthworks at Camden: suggest "Describing the destruction of much of the earthworks at Camden", presumably those of Fort Southerland haven't been destroyed.
  • Done

Other stuff

• Sources look OK
• I reviewed reference #3 (Mark K. Christ) against what it was cited for and found no issues there.
• No dupe links
• Image tag checks out OK

Generally looks in order, just minor tweaks required. Zawed (talk) 03:18, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

• @Zawed: - All of these have been addressed. Hog Farm _Talk 23:31, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

• This looks good. I am passing as GA as I believe it meets the necessary criteria. Zawed (talk) 09:45, 12 July 2022 (UTC)