Talk:Fort Selden

Latest comment: 6 years ago by CactusPolecat in topic This article needs greater balance

This article needs greater balance edit

One of the reasons the American military needed greater presence in this region was to police illegal activities by American settlers, traders, and filibusters who were moving through the lawless neutral zone into Texas, squatting on land illegally, inciting unrest in Indian tribes, and engaging in guerrilla raids against the Spanish. Despite repeated declarations by the American government that such activity was forbidden, little was done to curb it. American military forces at the south-west frontier were insufficient and poorly equipped, and their leaders, who mostly favoured an American invasion of Spanish dominions in the hopes of conquering Texas and even Cuba, were disinclined to police the situation except when specific orders were given. When the Spanish pushed back against the incursionists, exaggerated claims of an imminent Spanish invasion of American territory would become the stuff of public agitation, and worse, of the advice of American military leaders to their superiors.[1][2]

CactusPolecat (talk) 22:33, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ Middleton, H.F., Frontier outpost : a history of Fort Jesup, Louisiana, 1822-1846. 1973: [Baton Rouge, La.]
  2. ^ Hardin, J.F., Fort Jesup, Fort Selden, Camp Sabine, Camp Salubrity: Four forgotten frontier army posts of western Louisiana (first installment). The Louisiana Historical Quarterly, 1933. 16(1): p. 5-26.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fort Selden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:29, 4 October 2017 (UTC)Reply