Talk:Fort Rucker, Arizona

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Fortifications task force

United States: Arizona Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arizona portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).

2006 comment edit

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Regarding general public access not being permitted to Camp Rucker... I was there today and while the vehicle gate was locked, there is the standard V-shaped entry that allows human access without letting cows in, as well as a sign of rules. There was no mention about public access being prohibited. Several other people came in and looked around while I was there as well. So I'm guessing that the part mentioning public access being permitted is false. Thinking of uploading some photos I took of the place as well. --LoganCale (talk | contribs) 02:03, 19 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Add topic