Talk:Focus (Ariana Grande song)

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Focus (Ariana Grande song) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Focus (Ariana Grande song) was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (May 7, 2018). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Focus (Ariana Grande song) was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (May 22, 2016). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Ariana Grande Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ariana Grande, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ariana Grande on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ariana GrandeWikipedia:WikiProject Ariana GrandeTemplate:WikiProject Ariana GrandeAriana Grande articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on August 8, 2018.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge sections? edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Should the "Release formats" and "Radio and release history" sections be combined? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 00:23, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

(Two years later,) I believe this has been addressed. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 22:17, 7 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

WP:SYN edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

We do not have a reliable source stating reviews were positive/mixed to positive/mixed/mixed to negative/negative or anything else. Individual editors may wish to say this is the best/worst song in the history of the world, and they certainly welcome to do so. Just not here. - SummerPhD^v2.0 21:42, 17 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Dear IP editor repeatedly changing the "summary" of reviews to match your opinion of what that synthesis should be: Your opinion is no more valid than the other IP's opinion. Since the two of you will never agree as to whether or not the singer is the absolute best ever or the absolute worst ever, a WP:CONSENSUS here is unlikely.

Luckily, Wikipedia has a solution: Let the sources speak for themselves. Thanks. - SummerPhD^v2.0 00:00, 19 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic