Talk:First Qarmatian invasion of Egypt

First Qarmatian invasion of Egypt has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 4, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Military history: Middle East / Early Muslim

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Middle Eastern military history task force
	Early Muslim military history task force (c. 600 – c. 1600)

Islam: Muslim history

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Muslim history task force.

Egypt Low‑importance

	Egypt portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Including information on the page

Latest comment: 7 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Adding information to the page no need for removal. Informationsort (talk) 06:57, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

You've offered no good reason for your proposal, you have ignored instructions about providing attribution for your edits (since you've done nothing other than copy from another article), and you have continued to edit-war despite explicit warnings not to do so. Do not repeat this again unless you have a consensus. R Prazeres (talk) 07:09, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

Latest comment: 20 days ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Passed. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 02:37, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:First Qarmatian invasion of Egypt/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Cplakidas (talk · contribs) 19:13, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Iazyges (talk · contribs) 00:46, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Will take this on. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 00:46, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Criteria

GA Criteria

GA Criteria:

1
1.a Y

1.b Y
2
2.a  Y

2.b  Y

2.c  Y

2.d  Y
3
3.a Y

3.b Y
4
4.a Y
5
5.a Y
6
6.a Y

6.b Y

No DAB links Y
No dead links Y
No missing citations Y
Passes spot checks Y: Checked 20 and 27, no close paraphrasing or other issues.

Discussion

Prose Suggestions

Please note that almost all of these are suggestions, and can be implemented or ignored at your discretion. Any changes I deem necessary for the article to pass GA standards I will bold.

According to tradition, is this historical or Islamic tradition (or both)? I would specify here.
- Good question, in this case both, although this part of the story as told is largely reconstructed by modern historians; there are some dissenting voices (cf. Brett 2001), but this is by far the consensus opinion. I have removed this part as a a result.
Abu Sa'id was able to capture the region's capital suggest naming the capital that was captured (appears to be Hajr)
- Done.
The two branches went their separate ways after that suggest The two branches differed after that as slightly more formal.
- 'Differed' is an understatement; I want to emphasize that they did not have any contact and pursued different doctrinal developments. I have rephrased a bit around that, please have a look.
Al-As'am entered Damascus, where he read the Friday sermon on behalf of al-Muti' I would name the specific mosque it was read at (if it was known) as he presumably did not read it at all of them himself.
- I assume it would have been the Umayyad Mosque, but admittedly none of my sources say that. And the Friday sermon was typically read by one person, whether the mosque's preacher or, during special occasions, by the ruler or his representative (vizier or local governor).
which threw flasks of oil on the Qarmatian ships' decks and ignited them suggest which threw flasks of oil on the Qarmatian ships' decks that ignited them
- By 'them', the flasks are meant. Have rephrased slightly, hopefully the meaning is clear now.
@Cplakidas: That is all of my suggestions. A fascinating article; I shall hope to see it at FAC sometime in the future. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 06:07, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Iazyges, thanks for taking the time to review and for the suggestions! I have answered above. Constantine ✍ 19:49, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic