Talk:Fernando Dagnino Guerra

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

I think Fernando Dagnino's relevance is completely justified. Especially since he is catalogued within by several sources in Spain as part of the group of famous Spanish Comics artists. He is a colleague of Daniel Acuña and his biography and achivements can be compared with those reached by Raulo Cáceres both in the wikipedia. Therefore I don't see the reason for delete his entrance at the wikipedia. I am very new here and I don't know how to categorize his entrance. I would like to include him among those Spanish comics artists with a profile in English language. Thank you very much. Emurri (talk) 13:22, 21 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fernando Dagnino Guerra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:25, 31 December 2016 (UTC)Reply