Talk:Fellow of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Education

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Fellow of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Unsourced negative material edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The following used to be on the article page. Any charges of 'gross systemic issues' ought to be quoted directly from the relevant report, assuming that is what the report said.

Section removed

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

On the other hand, accountability at the administrative level has its challenges. The credibility of the RACP has been recently seriously compromised by consistent public domain reports of discretionary non objective assessments being applied to some medical practitioners. For example, the ongoing Federal Parliamentary Inquiry and the Senate Inquiry which hastily completed in June 2011, continue to reveal gross systemic issues in the Australian method of managing specialist recognition and registration - which is not confined alone to the RACP.

Debate will continue whether the Australian colleges (including the RACP) should retain their limited company status or be made accountable to a higher independent body eg Parliament. Till this is achieved, the postnominals will carry limited value internationally outside Australia and New Zealand and their Territories.

Please don't restore this until the relevant sources can be provided. Moreover, the wording should be made neutral so as not to imply that Wikipedia is taking sides. EdJohnston (talk) 14:13, 23 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Fellow of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:35, 30 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic