Talk:Farnsworth House (Plano, Illinois)

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles

Illinois Mid‑importance

	Illinois portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
High	This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cultural attitudes

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have added the cultural attitudes section because I find the non-neutral opinion-based edits to be of great interest as additional information about how the various members of a culture view a specific encyclopedia subject. This is difficult information to find on any particular subject without lenghty research of history, blogs and other websites. I do believe the main body of text should be strictly neutral and factual, per Wikipedia policy, but a separate subsection on the main page in a one-sentence per viewpoint succint format can add a deeper understanding of the significance of a subject.

It may or may not help resolve the problem of edit-wars on the main text of controversial subjects, but it wont erase the fact of controversey.

Please let it stay for a while.

Miesling 6-17-06

This section has been morphed from a list into prose and combined into a more succint format as the succint format from before was anything but.A mcmurray 05:30, 11 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Problems with tone, esp. WP:PEACOCK

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Much of this article could benefit from a major pruning or rewrite. The tone is particularly problematic as it wanders far afield from standard encyclopedic writing. The section Architecture as an Expression of the Times is particularly problematic as it reads much like an architecture critics review in a magazine rather than what one would expect to find in an encyclopedia. It is also mostly entirely uncited. Such writing has its place, but it reads like personal analysis of the original author, and as such, its place is not in Wikipedia. Ideas? --Jayron32 05:54, 11 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic