Talk:Fall to Grace

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Sources edit

critical reception edit

The album has been out for three days, we need to get the reviews. Here some:

The Guardian UK

BBC Music

Digital Spy

The Independent UK

The Express UK

--91.154.99.187 (talk) 05:16, 30 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 24 October 2015 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Cúchullain t/c 17:53, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply



Fall to Grace (album)Fall to Grace – The film isn't notable in the slightest compared to the album - and we don't need a disambiguation page if there are only two topics and one is primary. Unreal7 (talk) 23:34, 24 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose firstly dab page was incomplete - since en.wp was mislinking links about the 2005 film to the 2013 film. Secondly oppose as no Google Book evidence presented, thirdly 5 items featured on en.wp. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:47, 25 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Certainly by usage (September views):
So, 89% of views for the album. And nothing else has more long-term significance. Even with the expanded dab page, the album is a clear primary topic. Dohn joe (talk) 14:54, 26 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Well it isn't "zero" just because you haven't counted stats.grok.se for mentions of other topics on Jay Bakker Jim McGreevey René Alvarado Truly Indie List of Trapper John, M.D. episodes. Obviously pop albums get more because pop is popular. But this is still an encyclopedia that has to serve more than pop music. More to the point stats.grok only reflects what we provide, and we disproportionately provide post 2000 pop articles. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:24, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
IIO, I genuinely don't get why such blatant facts keep going right over your head. The album is the primary topic all day long. None of the other "Fall to Grace"'s have a patch of notability in comparison. You keep opposing songs/albums being the primary topic solely because they are songs/albums - please stop doing that. Unreal7 (talk) 19:00, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per nom and Dohn joe. Facts are stubborn things, IIO. Calidum 00:56, 28 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fall to Grace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:18, 27 September 2017 (UTC)Reply