Talk:FC Barcelona Femení

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on FC Barcelona (women). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111227112831/http://www.rfef.es/index.jsp?nodo=119&ID=1479 to http://www.rfef.es/index.jsp?nodo=119&ID=1479

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:28, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Real Madrid Femenino which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 15:22, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Need help to the women's team crest

Hello editors,

Last August 26, I requested permission from wikipedia to use the FC Barcelona crest (File:FC Barcelona (crest).svg) on ​​the page of the women's team as it is allowed in the male page. Permission has been inexplicably denied and I would like to make the following reflections:

1. The women's professional team page should have the same rights as the men's team page. I see no point in debating whether women's information pages can qualify for the same rights as men. I see gender discrimination.

2. There are more than 30 professional teams similar to FC Barcelona that have the club' crest in both the men's and women's teams: Arsenal, Manchester City, Manchester United, Liverpool, Tottenham Hotspur, Chelsea, Everton, Leicester City, West Ham United, Aston Villa, Paris Saint-Germain, Olympique Lyonnais, Wolfsburg, Bayern Munich, AC Milan, Juventus, Lazio, Fiorentina, Inter Milan, Napoli, Werder Bremen, Eintracht Frankfurt, FC Köln, Bayer Leverkusen, AFC Ajax, Feyenoord, Twente, Sporting CP, Braga, São Paulo FC, Palmeiras, Corinthians, Flamengo, Boca Juniors, River Plate and more.

3. The use of this crest on the FC Barcelona Women's page would not represent a violation of image rights in any case. Barça is an organization that promotes the free expression of content and the promotion of equality between men and women.

Can anyone help reverse this situation and be able to get permission? Vicpumu (talk) 05:39, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Popularity in the 1960s

Hello editors,

The sentence provided in the History section about the popularity of women's football in Spain and especially that of FC Barcelona is supported by a poor and confusing reference. Women's football had no popularity in the 60s in Spain. If no one objects, it will be removed permanently in the next few days. Blow.ofmind78 (talk) 05:49, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Blow.ofmind78, you have already deleted the following for the second time:

[[Women's football in Spain]], particularly [[Barcelona]], had a certain level of popularity in the 1960s, but was amateur and unofficial.<ref name="Alcalde 20202">{{cite journal |last1=Alcalde |first1=Maria Dolors Ribalta |last2=Martí |first2=Xavier Pujadas |date=January 22, 2020 |title=Women, Football, and Francoism: Lesbians and the Formation of Social Networks through Women's Football in Barcelona, 1970–1979 |url=https://cogentoa.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09523367.2020.1722646 |journal=The International Journal of the History of Sport |volume=37 |issue=1–2 |pages=94–112 |doi=10.1080/09523367.2020.1722646 |s2cid=214040923 |via=cogentoa.tandfonline.com (Atypon)}}</ref>

You did so with the surprising comment "Fake content. Fake source".

This source genuinely exists: doi:10.1080/09523367.2020.1722646. It's on my computer screen right now. For what it says about the girls playing soccer in the 1960s, see page 101. This is actually pretty weak, but the article seems to be a solid source for women's soccer in the early 70s.

When you say "Women's football had no popularity in the 60s in Spain", do you mean that it had none as a participant sport; and if so, what's your source for this? -- Hoary (talk) 06:04, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

This sentence suggests that women's football in Spain in the 60s was popular or had certain popularity. That is not true (SEE: [1], [2] or [3] all talking about the recent popularity). Nor does it say so in the reference provided. Today it is a popularity but not in the 60s or 70s. Real Madrid for example, created his women's section in 2020.. Blow.ofmind78 (talk) 06:58, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

You present three sources. The first clearly says that it's much more popular now than it was in the 70s. I don't think anyone would dispute this. The NYT article wants me to log in or something, so I didn't look at it. The Guardian article doesn't seem to say anything about the 60s or 70s. When you say that "Real Madrid for example, created his women's section in 2020" I imagine that you're correct and that this shows increased popularity; it doesn't say that soccer lacked a certain popularity among women decades earlier. Meanwhile, here's a paragraph from the reference that you have twice deleted:

The goal was to recruit players for the first four-team women’s football tournament in Catalonia. The event was called the Copa Pernod, and it was held on March 21 and 28, 1971 at the stadiums of Español (Sarriá) and F.C. Barcelona (Camp Nou). The final was played before 30,000 spectators, with the sports newspaper El Mundo Deportivo writing that the players were not very technically trained, but that ‘women’s football is just starting, and for the moment we can’t expect more’.

As for that newspaper article, an endnote specifies:

‘30.000 espectadores presenciaron el triunfo del espa ol sobre el Barcelona’, El Mundo Deportivo, March 29, 1971, 15.

Thirty thou sounds a lot to me. -- Hoary (talk) 08:47, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

It is important to differentiate popularity from novelty. Being popular means maintaining those 30,000 over a period of time. The novelty made the presence of so many people. If there had always been so many spectators, women's football would have been professionalized earlier. There were no established international competitions either. International women's club/national competitions appear in the 80s! And Copa Pernod as you stated, was not an official-regulated competition. So.. this spectators statistics are precise? Blow.ofmind78 (talk) 09:14, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Mate, just read the sourcing. And understand WP:V. Within hours of being told not to venture again into article space until you understand sourcing, you're removing content you don't understand while maligning the sourcing. That is a mix of ignorance and arrogance, and doesn't warrant addressing.

But you are also being fallacious. 1. Defining popularity only by consistent attendance figures is not realistic even in the modern day: women's soccer has become massively popular in Australia since the Women's World Cup - but the biggest in-person attendance this year is about 4,000. 2. It's not a 'novelty' when it's also including street football and the general population enjoying it regularly, over the period of a decade or so. Sources indicate a growing presence of women's football in the area over the 50s-60s, especially as a social outlet for lesbians. If you don't bother understanding available sources, and just assume there was one big match done for novelty, you can fall into that trap, but ignorance is not an excuse. 3. Sources also indicate that the city of Barcelona wanted to host the 1972 unofficial Women's World Cup (because of how popular it had become, natch) - by no international fixtures you must be referring to the RFEF, who still don't really like women's football. Indeed, regular newspaper coverage and a semi-pro women's team by 1973, without any official backing, indicates more popularity than if it was officially recognised and thus getting coverage as a matter of course.

Kingsif (talk) 11:40, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

First of all, it's surreal that you're instructing another user to put notices on my Talk page. That is indeed arrogant. Secondly, thinking and making people believe that women's football had popularity or some popularity in the 60s/70s in Spain is a very profound ignorance. The articles are not yours, even though you sometimes think so. Blow.ofmind78 (talk) 18:25, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

To think that I am committing acts of vandalism to reverse 1 time is also being arrogant and manipulative. Blow.ofmind78 (talk) 18:27, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

• @Hoary: Look at that user's talk page - just WP:DONTFEED. You, I, and any person being reasonable knows that "a certain level of popularity" means that it wasn't obscure, but wasn't massive — and that a good source makes this information WP:V, no matter if someone who doesn't read it wants to say they just know that people weren't actually interested (the source even refers to women's football in the decades before, and a minor resurgence in the 1960s as Franco lost influence, but that's obviously too much tenuous detail for this article). Leave a vandalism notice and report if it gets out of hand. Kingsif (talk) 10:53, 14 May 2024 (UTC)