Talk:Extensible programming

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

I applaud this page on extensible programming. It gives good background and touches on many important topics. While reading it, many thoughts occurred to me relating to how things may have changed since the historical context described in the page. For example, roughly 7 statements that use the word "must" may be updatable, to include newer developments that provide alternatives to what the page currently states. With permission, I would like to do a fairly extensive update, to include current research and state of the art developments in this area, such as meta workbenches, projective programming approaches that include extensibility, and papers that go into more depth on the types of extensibility.Seanhalle (talk) 16:22, 15 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Extensible programming. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:50, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply